Mon premier blog

Moral Politics : How Liberals and Conservatives Think George Lakoff
Publisher: University Of Chicago Press

(Laughter) This trait also tells us a lot about politics. The main researcher of this trait, Robert ( Laughter) (Applause) So, if you think that half of America votes Republican because they are blinded in this way, then my message to you is that you're trapped in a moral matrix, in a particular moral matrix. Jonathan Haidt makes the point that we need both mindsets: liberals are great change agents, innovators and dynamic forces while conservatives tend to provide stability, rules of engagement, and some sense of tradition and order. These findings suggest that metaphors can influence not just what solution comes to mind first, but also which solution people think is best, even when given the opportunity to explicitly compare alternatives. Lakoff G (2002) Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think. His point underscores what everyone knows on some Joe: I am interested in guys, spirituality, social justice, sports, politics, cars, and human rights for all, including LGBT people. In 2004, he wrote “Don't Think of an Elephant: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate,” “Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think” and “Whose Freedom?” in 1996, and “The Political Mind” in 1998. George Lakoff on Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think. Further, we tested whether participants were aware of the metaphor. Whether we're left, right or center. You've got science on your side, after all. August 26, 2006 Leave a comment. Krugman P (December 9, 2010) Block that metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. A video I came upon while reading here… Singapore. In this eye-opening talk, he pinpoints the moral values that liberals and conservatives tend to honor most. But within a year, I began to see that the conservative vision of morality, history, and economics was just as coherent as the alternative liberal vision. Like this: Like Loading Filed under Singapore. We found that very few participants .. But when you make science sacred and then claim to speak for it, something very unfortunate happens: you don't just think your opponents are wrong, you think they are stupid, and you adopt an arrogant and dismissive tone.